Title page of the 1723 pamphlet. Letterpress type reads: A Full and Exact Account, of the Tryal of all the Pyrates, Lately taken by Captain Ogle, On Board the Swallow Man of War, on the Coast of Guinea. Below a rule sits a diamond-shaped ornament of foliage, and beneath it the imprint: London, Printed, and Sold by J. Roberts, in Warwick-Lane. MDCCXXIII.
Title page, A Full and Exact Account, of the Tryal of All the Pyrates, Lately taken by Captain Ogle, on Board the Swallow Man of War, on the Coast of Guinea Printed and sold by J. Roberts, London, 1723; the imprint gives the year as MDCCXXIII. Digitised open-access copy, Internet Archive.

What this document is

The full title runs: A Full and Exact Account, of the Tryal of All the Pyrates, Lately Taken by Captain Ogle, on Board the Swallow Man of War, on the Coast of Guinea. It was printed and sold by J. Roberts in London in 1723, and it is the printed record of the Vice-Admiralty court held at Cape Coast Castle (Cabo Corso) in the spring of 1722 that tried the crew taken from Bartholomew Roberts's ships. It reprints Captain Chaloner Ogle's dispatch, then gives the indictment, the sworn depositions taken defendant by defendant, the servitude indentures, and the closing summary tables of verdicts.

It should not be confused with the manuscript proceedings. The court's own records survive at The National Archives in the High Court of Admiralty series, HCA 1/99, a composite piece the catalogue describes only as Vice-Admiralty proceedings including "Africa, 1722". That description does not name Roberts, Ogle or Cape Coast Castle, so the case identity is strong inference, and the piece is not digitised and can be consulted only on-site at Kew. This 1723 print, a period printed version of the trial rather than the court's own file, is the readable spine of the case.

A second period witness

The dispatch that opens the pamphlet was also printed verbatim in the London Gazette, issue 6091, giving two independent period witnesses to Ogle's death line and his Whydah burnt-ship line. The surviving scan of the pamphlet is rough, and every excerpt below was checked against sense before it was quoted.

Short verbatim excerpts

Five passages carry most of the weight the print is used for on this site. Each is transcribed from the digitised copy, corrected only where the scan garbled a word the surrounding sense fixes.

"That ye not only made this Fight and insolent Resistance against the King's Ship, without any Pretence of Authority more than that of your own private depraved Wills, but did it also under a Black Flag."

From the indictment. The court's charge that the crew acted under authority of their own making is the record's own statement of what pirate self-government looked like from the bench.

"That every one of them signed their Pyratical Articles, and shared their Plunder, some few only excepted, who since their being on Board, had never seen a Prize taken."

The court's summary of the Ranger's men. The signing of articles and the sharing of plunder are recorded as the routine of the company, not as an accusation to be proved.

"Captain Joseph Trahern deposed, That he was dragged along to the Signing of their Articles; that he was the last among his Men that did sign them, and shewed himself the most unwilling to go."

A deposition on forced signing. Many defendants pleaded that they signed the articles under compulsion, which is why the signing itself is so heavily attested in the print.

"Edward Evans, Cook of the Porcupine ... burnt she was under the dreadful choice of perishing by Fire or Water; those who jump'd over-board to avoid the Flames that spread towards them, were immediately seized by the Sharks, who tore their Limbs off in the sight of those Villains, who took a cruel satisfaction in looking on."

Sworn evidence on the burning of the slave ship Porcupine at Whydah on 14 January. This deposition, with others naming the ship's second mate, cook and mate, is what carries the burning beyond Johnson into the sworn record.

"...and each of you, are sentenced and adjudged to return to the Place from whence ye came, from thence to the Place of Execution, and there within the Flood-marks to be hanged by the Neck till ye are Dead, Dead, Dead. And the Lord have Mercy upon your Souls."

The sentence, in the old triple form, signed by Mungo Herdman as President with John Atkins as Register. Named men were further ordered to be "taken down, and your Bodies hung in Chains".

What the print establishes

Custody and rights

The pamphlet is public-domain by age, printed in 1723, and the Internet Archive copy is open access. Bibliographic control sits at WorldCat under OCLC 83269383, with the imprint "Printed, and sold by J. Roberts", London, 1723. What is not settled is whether the scholarly document collections that reprint Golden Age trial material, the Baer collection of 2007 and E. T. Fox's Pirates in Their Own Words of 2014, reproduce the full Ogle trial transcript or only extracts. That is not yet established, and it is not assumed.

Internal defects noted

Every source in the Archives has its faults named, and this one has several. The surviving scan is rough throughout, so the transcriptions here are corrected readings, not a facsimile transcription, and where a summary digit is garbled the count is given from the surrounding list: the respited group and the Marshalsea group read conventionally as 2 and 17 because the summary box digits are unclear, while the named lists survive. The pamphlet prints no single "number taken" figure anywhere, which is why the widely repeated "272 taken" is a modern reconstruction and is labelled as one across this Collection. And the precise wording of the court's address to the prisoners, the passage that casts them as men who set their own officers over themselves, sits in a part of the text the scan does not preserve cleanly, so it is not quoted here as verbatim.

Limitations of this room

The print is complete and read, but it is a printed account, not the court's own file, and it is not neutral. It secures the state's case: it is thorough on who resisted, who signed articles and who hanged, and nearly silent on the enslaved Africans who were returned to the Royal African Company as property rather than tried. That silence is part of what the document is. The manuscript proceedings in HCA 1/99 and Ogle's own dispatch in ADM 1/2242 are not digitised and can be consulted only at Kew, and the per-defendant verdicts needed for individual attribution are not yet established.